Supreme Court Justices are skeptical about the phrase ‘one country, under God’.
“While legal precedent makes reciting the pledge a voluntary act, Newdow says it becomes unconstitutional for students to be forced to hear it, arguing the teacher-led recitations carry the stamp of government approval.”
Yeah, well, what about me being forced to hear your goddamned atheistic bullshit? Its not a prayer, trust me. I’ve heard prayers, they usually involve smaller words, and ‘hey, God! I want this and this and this’, its oftentimes like a christmas list for adults. Of course, being you’re an atheist you wouldn’t know this.
I can forgive your confusion I suppose, but seriously…
But my main problem with this asshole is that he’s USING his daughter for this case. She has no problem with saying the pledge, never has. Then WHY THE HELL ARE YOU EVEN USING HER? Its no wonder that you’re divorced, you asshole! Using your child to support a POLITICAL position which isn’t even hurting her is despicable.
I would say POLITCAL because its hardly a religious one when the supposed ‘aggreived’ party, in this case the little girl, has no religious problems with it.